PDA

View Full Version : Lowdown on Longhorn and the hybrid EMR



DrWinn
09-18-2004, 06:49 PM
Here is the skinny on Microsoft's next generation Windows and how it will transform the EMR landscape
First off, I want to start by saying that I don’t particularly like Microsoft. They remain a monopoly and seem to be conspicuously devoid of ethics. I have shared my opinion of them with groups like the AAFP (whom we believe then shared that opinion with Microsoft, based on subsequent MS behaviors – thanks AAFP/Dr. Henley!) Anyway, there is no love lost between us. That said, I believe MS will continue to utterly dominate the desktop. Their strategy with Longhorn, Indigo (XML messaging/SOAP) and Yukon (next version of MS SQL server) is so compelling as to make users of open source throw in the towel. Fortune and Scientific American have both lamented the brain trust drain that Redmond has created. There is no shortage of genius’ working for MS.

So, how is this hybrid strategy of marrying the rich GUI (Longhorn/Avalon) and the web (.net/Indigo) going to control the world? The GUI is the least exciting of the components. It will provide a 3D ‘world’ to viewing information that is marginally superior to Windows XP. It will, of course, remain far superior to the GUI constraints imposed by pure web ’Java’ applications. As good as the new presentation layer will be (called Avalon), it pales in comparison to the other planned enhancements (some are in beta now). The windows file system (Win FS) will inherent the search capabilities, speed and scale of MS next generation SQL (Yukon). Data in files and documents will inherent the advantages of both the traditional relational databases and automatic XML indexing. That means enormous amounts of data (like google searchs) will be searched and results returned almost instantaneously. Fuzzy logic and embedded and indexed XML will make finding a needle in a haystack easy. Now here’s the rub. This ‘morphed’ Yukon object database (similar to Cache used by EPIC) will effectively lock developers/users into the MS world. MS is betting that the advances will be such a paradigm shift that everyone will bend to their will. All I can say is “yes master”.

MS hasn’t made everything proprietary. They have opened XML/Soap (Indigo) up so that it becomes the standard for data transport. The advantage to developers is significant. Unlike the prone to fail bridges that plague so many data transactions today (and why integration is a good thing), Indigo will allow the use of metadata tags to identify information and bypass the need for lengthy custom code. Indigo will be the backbone of XML/HL7 and the CCR interoperability standards that everyone is so jazzed about.

So, the ideal EMR will embrace the GUI richness of Avalon, the indexing performance of Yukon and the centralized IT management capabilities and automatic updates of .net. This will essentially make the next generation hybrid EMR possible – the best of both worlds. So where does e-MDs fit into all of this? Well, we’ve designed our database to take advantage of the object model (MS didn’t rate our db #1 for nothin). Our apps are modular, so we have been porting them to .net in stages. When Longhorn ships we will be ready with open arms. And yes, we will be married to Microsoft. Maybe being a concubine isn’t so terrible. I just hope Mr. Gates will be gentle.

alborg
09-19-2004, 02:42 AM
Hi David:

It's not nice to advertise your product using scare tactics... but good review of MS plans, nevertheless.

>>>Here is the skinny on Microsoft's next generation Windows and how it will transform the EMR landscape

Yeah, right. They made MS Office more complicated with the addition of XML and incorporating Visio and since then they are having a difficult time selling the sucker. Now they want to add more bloat to their Windows product. Just go to Yahoo.com and look at the MSFT stock performance- flat since 1/2002 (i.e. less than 30). Last year they laid off about 1000 folks. Seems like a company pretty much in trouble, I'd say.

>>> That said, I believe MS will continue to utterly dominate the desktop.

As long as they continue with their product activation strategy, they will eventually die off.

>>> Fortune and Scientific American have both lamented the brain trust drain that Redmond has created. There is no shortage of genius’ working for MS.

Yeah, my niece works in Redmond for MS; when she got married, I got to meet some of the other MS developers. They are very bright indeed.

They will be needed, though, to fight off the competition from Sybase, Oracle, and even MySQL... all of whom have great minds too.

>>> MS is betting that the advances will be such a paradigm shift that everyone will bend to their will.

That's a laugh... let's get the real scoop of what will overtake the market. Windows may rule for the near future, but competition from Linux will be fierce.

Their EMR initiative (Amicore) was a bust, BTW. Even when they tried to team up with the IBM and Pfizer powerhouses in an effort to try to take over the market, their product was virtually ignored by consumers. Here's a quote from the local media:

"Despite the blue-chip backing, Amicore has struggled the past two years and stopped selling its current products during the retrenchment that led to AIM. One blow in March was the nearby Massachusetts Medical Society's selection of a competing system from Greenway Medical Technologies as "preferred."

"We were hugely disappointed," Noffsinger admitted. He hopes the new platform will steal some of Greenway's thunder."

URL: http://www.health-itworld.com/enews/06-10-2004_227.html

Now let's discuss the future of "open source" (i.e. "free")-> Go to PCWorld.com and read the article on "open source":

Open Source > Open Source Software Goes to Work
Businesses don't have to dump Windows to test drive free or low-price applications whose use may improve the bottom line. (17-Sep-2004)
http://pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,117802,00.asp

So don't bet all your apples on Microsoft...

Al

DrWinn
09-19-2004, 10:21 AM
Hi David:

It's not nice to advertise your product using scare tactics... but good review of MS plans, nevertheless.



Actually, Al, any time I post, someone invariably acuses me of advertising... Interestingly, I see other companies use this board and others very effectively to advertise by having a third party jump in and hype some new feature or experience. Frequently they are new member 'physicians' who just wanted to tell the whole world how wonderful XYZ company is. I don't hide behind a new nick every other week like some of these 'ghost' authors.

And by the way, Amicore does blow - although the new version is suppossed to be much better - haven't seen it yet. As far as scare tactics, I would be more concerned about CCR and it's impact on low priced or free EMRs than Microsoft.

ozzie
09-19-2004, 04:06 PM
Dr's cant agree to disagree on how not get screwed but the very hands that feed them called insurance companies.
And your worried about redmond /??
XML SOAP CCR etc mean little to the docs without EMR systems and in a local context means little to docs that already have EMR systems..
MS is playing an apache / http catchup game and MS is still losing badly.
open source Db are kicking MS Sql butt in the web market and MS know it.

Sleeping with the king of pop was ok too until the kids grew up.. LOL
Ms can dominate the desktop till the cows come home who cares. As long as you can browse and use http(s) the desktop should mean nothing.

Seems to me you have fallen for the MS trap ..